End-to-End Genotyping by Sequencing (GBS) Service - Low-Cost SNP Discovery

Efficiently genotype hundreds or thousands of samples with our high-throughput GBS (Genotyping by Sequencing) platform—optimized for GWAS, molecular breeding, population genomics, and non-model species. CD Genomics delivers >95% genotyping accuracy, scalable analysis pipelines, and 50% lower cost than traditional SNP arrays.

  • Accurate genotyping across complex or unknown genomes
  • Ideal for species without a reference genome
  • End-to-end workflow from DNA to data analysis
Sample Submission Guidelines

Deliverables

  • Raw sequencing data (FASTQ format)
  • QC report (with summary plots)
  • SNP/INDEL results (VCF files + annotated tables)
  • Population structure and phylogenetic outputs (optional)
  • Comprehensive bioinformatics report
Table of Contents
  • What is Genotyping by Sequencing (GBS)
  • Why Choose GBS
  • GBS Service Workflow
  • Applications of Genotyping-by-Sequencing Across Research and Industry
  • Bioinformatics Services for GBS
  • Quality Control You Can Trust
  • Sample Requirements for GBS
  • Why Choose CD Genomics for Your GBS Project

Download our Genotyping Solutions Brochure for a quick overview of our full-service genotyping options.
View Full Catalog

What is Genotyping by Sequencing (GBS)

GBS is a next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based method that enables genome-wide SNP identification across large populations. It is especially suitable for species with limited genomic information and for projects requiring high-throughput, cost-efficient genotyping.

This technique is widely used in:

  • Genetic mapping
  • Population genetics
  • Marker-assisted selection
  • Molecular breeding

GBS workflow involves the following steps:

  • Genome complexity reduction via restriction enzyme digestion
  • Barcode ligation for multiplexed pooling
  • Sequencing using Illumina platforms (e.g., NovaSeq)
  • SNP calling using robust bioinformatics pipelines

Unlike traditional SNP arrays, GBS does not require a reference genome, making it ideal for non-model or understudied organisms.

SGBS workflow

Why Choose GBS

GBS offers multiple advantages over traditional genotyping methods, making it a go-to choice for high-throughput population studies, breeding programs, and species with limited genomic data.

  • No Reference Genome Required
    GBS works seamlessly with non-model organisms and incomplete genomes, reducing the barrier to entry for early-stage studies.
  • Lower Cost per Sample
    By focusing on specific genomic regions and reducing sequencing depth, GBS can cut costs by over 50% compared to whole-genome resequencing.
  • High Throughput for Large Projects
    Process hundreds to thousands of samples in parallel—ideal for GWAS, QTL mapping, and breeding pipelines.
  • SNPs in Gene-Rich Regions
    GBS captures SNPs enriched in coding regions, enabling better trait association and more biologically relevant insights.
  • Streamlined, Fast Workflow
    Simple protocol without fragment size selection. Rapid turnaround with minimal library prep time—perfect for tight timelines and limited budgets.

GBS vs Other Genotyping Methods

Feature / Method GBS RAD-seq ddRAD Whole-Genome Resequencing
Library Prep Simple, no fragment selection Complex, size selection required Dual enzyme cut + size selection Whole-genome library
Reference Genome Needed No No No Yes
Input DNA Requirement Low (≥100 ng) Moderate Moderate High
Cost Low Medium Medium to High High
Coverage Gene-rich, wide genome coverage Near enzyme cut sites More targeted Entire genome
Best For GWAS, breeding, population studies Structure & diversity studies Small genomes Mutation & reference-based analysis

If you're seeking a budget-friendly, scalable, and standardized genotyping solution, GBS is the ideal choice for your next population-scale project.

GBS Service Workflow

End-to-end genotyping—from sample to publication-ready data

Project Start

Project discussion

Technical assessment

Plan confirmation

Sample Reception & QC

Sample registration

DNA quantification

Purity & integrity assessment

Optional: DNA extraction

Library Preparation

Genomic digestion with restriction enzymes

Barcode adaptor ligation

Library construction

Library quality control

High-Throughput Sequencing

Platform: NovaSeq / HiSeq PE150

Insert size: 250–350 bp

Data output:

≥3 Gb/sample for population genetics

≥10 Gb/sample for GWAS

Data Analysis & Delivery

Raw data in FASTQ format

QC report

SNP calling & alignment

Population genetics analysis

Custom bioinformatics solutions

Get Your Instant Quote

Applications of Genotyping-by-Sequencing Across Research and Industry

Crop Breeding:

  • DNA fingerprinting for variety identification
  • Mapping of disease-resistant or drought-tolerant genes
  • Hybrid purity testing

Population Genetics:

  • Assessing genetic diversity in endangered species
  • Reconstructing evolutionary history
  • Exploring local adaptation mechanisms

Biomedical Research:

  • Complex disease gene associations
  • Pharmacogenomic profiling
  • Tumor heterogeneity studies

Animal & Aquaculture Breeding:

  • Disease-resistant shrimp strains
  • Genomic prediction of dairy yield
  • Optimizing feed conversion in poultry

Microbial Community Studies:

  • Functional typing of environmental microbiomes
  • Tracing transmission routes of pathogens

Integrated Solutions:

  • 16S rRNA + GBS combined analysis
  • Rapid antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene screening

Why Top Journals Choose GBS:

Nature Genetics: 42% of population studies in 2023 used GBS data
Plant Biotechnology Journal: GBS recommended as a gold standard for marker discovery

Bioinformatics Services for GBS

At CD Genomics, we provide end-to-end GBS bioinformatics services—from rigorous data QC to deep variant discovery. Whether you're decoding complex trait inheritance or making breeding decisions, our analysis pipeline is designed to deliver clarity, accuracy, and reproducibility.

Data Preprocessing & Quality Control:

  • Adapter trimming and low-quality read filtering
  • Detection of adapter contamination
  • Base quality evaluation (Q20/Q30 metrics)

SNP Detection & Alignment:

  • Read alignment using BWA or Bowtie2
  • Variant calling using GATK or FreeBayes
  • SNP/INDEL annotation and summary statistics

Population Genetics (Optional Module):

  • Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
  • Population structure (Structure/Admixture)
  • Phylogenetic tree construction
  • Genetic distance matrix
  • Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis

GBS Bioinformatics workflow

Quality Control You Can Trust

ChIP-Seq stands as a fundamental technique in epigenetics and gene regulation research. It is widely used across various fields to uncover gene expression control mechanisms and chromatin function:

Sample integrity check

before library prep

Library QC

for insert size and concentration

Post-sequencing quality assessment

including coverage, read depth, and variant detection metrics

Sample Requirements for GBS

Parameter Specification
Sample type Genomic DNA
Recommended input ≥300 ng
Minimum input ≥100 ng
DNA concentration ≥10 ng/μL
Purity (OD260/280) 1.8–2.0
Integrity No degradation or visible impurities
RNA contamination Must be removed via RNase treatment

📌 If your samples do not meet the recommended criteria, we also provide DNA extraction services. Please contact us to assess sample suitability or request detailed submission guidelines.

Why Choose CD Genomics for Your GBS Project

  • 95%+ Genotyping Accuracy
    Achieve high-confidence variant calls at every site—crucial for robust downstream analysis.
  • High-Throughput Scalability
    Our pipeline supports thousands of samples in parallel, ideal for large-scale population studies and breeding trials.
  • Cost-Effective by Design
    Our optimised GBS protocol reduces per-sample sequencing costs by over 50% compared to whole-genome resequencing.
  • All-in-One Project Management
    From DNA to deliverables, we handle the entire workflow—saving your team valuable time and resources.
  • Flexible Data Analysis Options
    Get exactly the insights you need with customisable bioinformatics pipelines and modular reporting.
  • Fast Turnaround & Expert Support
    Speed meets reliability—our seasoned lab and data teams ensure timely results and expert consultation at every step.

Partial results are shown below:

An overview of genetic distances between samples visualized as a tree.

Distance Tree

Principal Component Analysis illustrating genetic diversity within the sample set.

PCA Analysis

Heatmap depiction showing expression levels or variant frequencies across different conditions.

Heatmap

Diagram demonstrating evolutionary relationships among various species or sample groups.

Phylogenetic Tree

1. What is the definition of a GBS Tag?

A GBS Tag refers to a sequence of reads adjacent to a restriction enzyme cut site. The genomic coverage captured by GBS is determined by multiplying the number of Tags by the length of a single read. For instance, utilizing HiSeq 4000 PE150 sequencing, the genomic coverage can be calculated as follows:

GBS captured genomic range=100,000 Tag x 150bp/Tag=100000X150=15 M

If the average sequencing depth per sample is 10x per Tag, the sequencing data volume per sample would be:

15Mx 10=150 M

2. How to select the number of Tags?

The required number of Tags varies depending on the specific research objectives. For example, GWAS might necessitate tens of thousands of high-density molecular markers, whereas studies on phylogenetic relationships or linkage analysis may only require a few hundred to a few thousand molecular markers to achieve satisfactory results. Hence, it is crucial to first evaluate the necessary number of Tags based on the study's requirements and then select an appropriate number of Tags accordingly.

For species with a genome size less than 1 Gb undergoing genetic linkage map studies, a common recommendation is to utilize approximately 100,000 Tags. Adjustments to the number of Tags can be made based on specific research needs.

Table 1. Commonly used GBS Tag numbers (e.g., for genetic linkage maps).

Genome Size Number of Tags
Below 10G ≥10W tag
1-2G ≥15W tag
2-3G ≥20W tag

3. Can GBS be used for non-reference species?

GBS can indeed be utilized for non-reference species to obtain SNP markers. However, the lack of annotated genomic information in non-reference species presents a significant challenge, often rendering the identification of candidate genes unfeasible. For tasks such as quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, association studies, or the mining of genes related to domestication traits, it is advisable to utilize reference species to achieve more accurate and informative results.

4. Can GBS be applied to polyploid species?

GBS technology is applicable to polyploid species. A salient example is the successful application of GBS to hexaploid oat species for genetic mapping in 2014. Polyploid species are characterized by their complex ploidy levels, which can include both autopolyploids and allopolyploids, as well as tetraploids and hexaploids. Each scenario requires specific analytical considerations. Current research efforts have already begun to employ GBS for genetic mapping in polyploid crops such as wheat and cotton.

5. Is GBS suitable for inter-species research?

GBS leverages restriction enzymes for genome capture, thereby facilitating the development of SNP markers needed for genetic linkage and population genetic analyses. Significant genetic divergence between samples can result in non-uniform capture of restriction fragments across samples and a paucity of shared SNPs. Consequently, GBS is predominantly suited for studies at the intra-species level. Nonetheless, in rare cases where there is a close phylogenetic relationship between different species within the same genus and minimal genetic divergence, GBS can be employed effectively for phylogenetic studies.

6. Can GBS data be integrated with other omics datasets (e.g., transcriptomics)?

Absolutely. We offer multi-omics integration to help uncover deeper genetic mechanisms.

Available analyses include:

  • eQTL mapping (requires RNA-seq data)
  • Epigenetic association studies (integrating DNA methylation or ChIP-seq data)

7. My DNA samples don't meet the recommended input or concentration. Can I still use GBS?

While we recommend ≥300 ng of DNA per sample at a concentration of ≥10 ng/μL for optimal results, we’re flexible.

  • What to do: Contact our technical team for a quick feasibility assessment.
  • Need help? We offer in-house DNA extraction services if your sample quantity or quality is suboptimal.

8. Can I request only sequencing data without bioinformatics analysis?

Yes, we offer modular GBS services.

  • Choose the level of support you need—from library prep and sequencing only, to full bioinformatics analysis.
  • This flexibility allows you to integrate our services seamlessly into your own research pipeline.

9. Do you support large-scale GBS projects involving thousands of samples?

Yes, we specialise in high-throughput GBS services.

  • Our automated library prep and advanced sequencing platforms (e.g., NovaSeq) can handle thousands of samples in parallel.
  • This is ideal for large-scale breeding programs, GWAS, or population genetics studies.

Customer Publication Highlight

Use of biostimulants for water stress mitigation in two durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) genotypes with different drought tolerance

Journal: Plant Stress  

Published: December 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2024.100566

Background

Durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) is a staple crop in the Mediterranean region, but its productivity is severely threatened by drought stress. Biostimulants have emerged as a promising agronomic strategy to enhance drought tolerance. This study evaluated the efficacy of two biostimulants (B1 and B2) in mitigating water stress effects on two durum wheat genotypes—drought-tolerant Svems16 and drought-sensitive Iride—through physiological, morphological, and genomic analyses.

Project Objective

The research aimed to:

  1. Assess the impact of biostimulants on growth performance under drought stress.
  2. Identify genetic variants associated with drought tolerance using Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS).
  3. Elucidate the mechanisms of biostimulant-induced stress mitigation.

CD Genomics' Services

As a leader in genomic solutions, CD Genomics provided:

  • GBS Analysis: High-throughput sequencing using the NovaSeq platform (5M PE150 reads per sample) to identify SNPs and InDels.
  • Variant Calling: Alignment to the Svevo.v1 reference genome, quality control, and annotation using GATK and SnpEff.
  • Functional Profiling: Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis to pinpoint drought-responsive genes and pathways.

Key Findings

1. Biostimulants Mitigate Drought Stress in Sensitive Genotypes

  • Iride (sensitive): Drought reduced shoot biomass by 25% and root biomass by 29%, but biostimulant application (B1/B2) restored growth by up to 37%.
  • Svems16 (tolerant): Minimal biomass loss under stress; biostimulants showed limited efficacy, confirming innate tolerance.

2. Genomic Basis of Drought Tolerance

  • GBS Analysis: Revealed 7,000 shared variants between Iride and Svems16, with distinct missense mutations in dehydrin and histidine kinase genes (e.g., TRITD6Bv1G204160 in Svems16).
  • GO Enrichment: Svems16 exhibited variants in water deprivation-response genes (e.g., GO:0042631), explaining its superior tolerance.

3. Physiological Adaptations

  • Stomatal Density: Drought reduced stomata by 15–16%; biostimulants increased density by 26–30% in Iride.
  • Oxidative Stress: MDA (lipid peroxidation marker) spiked in Iride under drought (+165% in roots), but biostimulants partially alleviated oxidative damage.

4. Root Architecture Modulation

  • Biostimulants induced thicker, shorter roots in control plants. Under drought, Iride developed longer roots with more tips, while Svems16 maintained stable morphology.

Figures Referenced

Figure 7 displays the spread of  genomic variants and GO enrichment that underline genes responsive to drought  conditions in Svems16.Figure 7: Genomic variant distribution and GO enrichment highlights drought-responsive genes in Svems16

Figure 5 compares stomatal density  alterations observed when biostimulants and drought are applied.Figure 5: Stomatal density changes under biostimulant and drought treatments.

Implications

This study demonstrates that biostimulants can effectively mitigate drought stress in sensitive durum wheat cultivars by modulating root morphology and stomatal density. CD Genomics' GBS analysis provided critical insights into the genetic basis of drought tolerance, enabling targeted breeding strategies. The findings support the use of biostimulants as a sustainable tool to enhance crop resilience in water-limited environments.

CD Genomics' Contribution: By delivering high-resolution genomic data and variant annotation, CD Genomics enabled the identification of key genetic markers for drought tolerance, paving the way for precision agriculture in cereal crops.

Reference

  1. Spada, Matteo, et al. "Use of biostimulants for water stress mitigation in two durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) genotypes with different drought tolerance." Plant Stress 14 (2024): 100566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2024.100566

Here are some publications that have been successfully published using our services or other related services:

Use of biostimulants for water stress mitigation in two durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) genotypes with different drought tolerance

Journal: Plant Stress

Year: 2024

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2024.100566

The Restriction-Modification Systems of Clostridium carboxidivorans P7

Journal: Microorganisms

Year: 2023

https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11122962

In the land of the blind: Exceptional subterranean speciation of cryptic troglobitic spiders of the genus Tegenaria (Araneae: Agelenidae) in Israel

Journal: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Year: 2023

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107705

Genetic Modifiers of Oral Nicotine Consumption in Chrna5 Null Mutant Mice

Journal: Front. Psychiatry

Year: 2021

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.773400

A high-density genetic linkage map and QTL identification for growth traits in dusky kob (Argyrosomus japonicus)

Journal: Aquaculture

Year: 2024

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.740786

Genomic and chemical evidence for local adaptation in resistance to different herbivores in Datura stramonium

Journal: Evolution

Year: 2020

https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14097

See more articles published by our clients.

For research purposes only, not intended for clinical diagnosis, treatment, or individual health assessments.
Featured Resources
Related Services
Quote Request
! For research purposes only, not intended for clinical diagnosis, treatment, or individual health assessments.
Contact CD Genomics
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Feedback   Copyright © 2025 CD Genomics. All rights reserved.
Top

We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve the overall user experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. Read our Privacy Policy

Accept Cookies
x