Our innovative solution synergistically combines polygenic risk score (PRS) modeling with profound pharmacogenomic insights, aiming to propel precision medicine to new heights. Through the seamless integration of genome-wide association study (GWAS) data and pharmacogenomic biomarkers, we meticulously develop advanced PRS algorithms. These algorithms quantify each individual's genetic susceptibility to a spectrum of complex diseases.
In the era of personalized health management, our genetic makeup provides a wealth of information about our unique biological characteristics. Among them, Pharmacogenomics (PGx) and Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) are two important research fields, which help us understand the relationship between genes and health from different perspectives.
Pharmacogenomics is a discipline that studies how an individual's genetic variations affect their body's response to specific drugs. Everyone's genes have minor differences (referred to as single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPS), and these differences may lead to different activities of certain enzymes (proteins responsible for breaking down or transporting drugs) in the body. The level of enzyme activity directly affects the concentration and efficacy of drugs in the body. Polygenic risk score is a statistical tool used to estimate the degree of genetic predisposition an individual has for a certain common health condition (such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, etc.) based on multiple genetic variations (usually thousands or even millions). Researchers have compared the genetic data of millions of people with their health records through large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify thousands of genetic variations that are significantly associated with specific health conditions. Each variation is assigned a weight based on the magnitude of its impact. PRS is derived by adding up the weights of all the risk variations a person possesses.
Our Pharmacogenomics & Polygenic Risk Scores Service Enhances Your Research with:
Pharmacogenomics (PGx) and Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) are two powerful fields at the intersection of genetics and data science. Pharmacogenomics and PRS modeling merge genomics with statistical algorithms to predict drug efficacy and disease susceptibility. PRS quantifies cumulative genetic risk by aggregating variants across the genome, while pharmacogenomics identifies gene-drug interactions influencing treatment response. Integrating these approaches enables drug selection and dosage adjustments, optimizing therapeutic outcomes.
Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS)
Whole Exome Sequencing (WES)
Genotyping Arrays
PRS Algorithm Development
Population Stratification Correction
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Modeling
Figure 1: Pharmacogenomics & Polygenic Risk Scores
Seamlessly combine pharmacogenomic data (e.g., drug-metabolizing enzyme variants) with PRS models tailored to specific diseases or drug responses. This enables precise prediction of treatment efficacy and adverse event risks across diverse populations, leveraging multi-ethnic genomic datasets for broader applicability.
Validate PRS models using real-world evidence from 100,000+ patient cohorts, ensuring robust performance across ancestries. Our platform supports end-to-end workflows, from variant selection to risk stratification, accelerating regulatory approval and adoption in precision oncology, cardiology, and rare disease management.
Leverage machine learning algorithms to refine polygenic models, improving risk prediction for complex traits and therapeutic outcomes. Our adaptive models dynamically update with new data, ensuring relevance across evolving genomic landscapes.
Seamlessly combine genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data to unravel molecular mechanisms underlying drug response variability. This holistic approach enhances PRS accuracy by capturing regulatory and functional impacts of genetic variants.
Genomic profiling uncovers disease-associated genes and pathways, providing high-confidence targets for drug development.
Example: Cystic Fibrosis (CF) and CFTR Modulators
PRS models quantify cumulative genetic susceptibility to complex diseases, identifying high-risk subgroups for targeted interventions.
Example: Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and Statin Therapy
Genetic testing predicts drug metabolism efficiency, enabling tailored dosing to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity.
Example: Warfarin and CYP2C9/VKORC1 Genotyping
PRS models identify genetically homogeneous subgroups, improving trial efficiency and success rates for novel therapies.
Example: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Anti-Amyloid Therapies
Figure 2: Implementation of PRS results into medical decision process. (Simona, 2023)
Decoding triancestral origins, archaic introgression, and natural selection in the Japanese population by whole-genome sequencing.
Journal:Sci Adv.
Published:2024
Circulating lipids, encompassing total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), stand as crucial, modifiable, and heritable risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). Previous research indicates a moderate-to-high heritability for lipid level variations, with estimates spanning 20 to 60%. Despite genome-wide association studies (GWASs) identifying numerous common susceptibility variants for circulating lipids, most confer only minor individual risks and exhibit limited predictive power for CHD. Traditional polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for lipid traits, constructed solely from genome-wide significant genetic variants, have also shown limited success in enhancing CHD risk prediction. Thus, there is a pressing need for more comprehensive and effective genetic tools to quantify lifetime disease risk and improve risk stratification for clinical utility.
Leveraging advancements in computational algorithms and large-scale datasets, novel PRSs for common diseases have been developed and validated. These PRSs fully capture genome-wide variation and are constructed using two primary strategies: (1) liberalizing significance thresholds for variant inclusion while accounting for linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns in specific populations, and (2) assigning new variant weightings via Bayesian methods that infer posterior mean effects using GWAS summary statistics, genomic correlation information, and pre-specified causal variant proportions. For instance, Khera et al. constructed six genome-wide PRSs incorporating 5,218 to 6,917,436 common genetic variants to predict risks for CHD, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes (T2D), inflammatory bowel disease, breast cancer, and severe obesity in predominantly European ancestry cohorts. Building on these advancements, recently developed computational methods were applied to optimize PRSs for four lipid traits across multiple East Asian cohorts at various life stages, with subsequent testing in general populations and T2D patients. The best-performing PRSs were further evaluated for their impact on 3-year lipid changes in adolescents and their potential clinical implications for subclinical atherosclerosis in adult women and CHD in T2D patients.
The optimized PRSs demonstrated robust predictive performance for lipid traits in East Asian populations, outperforming traditional PRSs limited to genome-wide significant variants. These scores effectively captured genome-wide genetic variation and improved risk stratification for dyslipidemia and T2D-related cardiovascular complications. In adolescents, the best-performing PRSs were significantly associated with 3-year lipid level changes, highlighting their potential for early identification of individuals at risk for metabolic disorders. Furthermore, in adult women, these PRSs were linked to subclinical atherosclerosis, while in T2D patients, they showed promise in predicting CHD risk, underscoring their clinical utility across diverse populations and disease contexts. These findings support the integration of comprehensive genetic information into risk assessment frameworks to enhance precision medicine and preventive healthcare strategies.
Figure 3: Odds ratio (OR) of coronary heart disease stratified by quintile of polygenic risk scores.
A: Unlike one-size-fits-all trials, pharmacogenomics:
A: We validate models through:
A: Traditional screening often focuses on common variants in European populations, while population genetics services:
References