CD Genomics utilizes advanced evolutionary tree analysis services. It unravels the intricate web of evolutionary relationships among species. It also clarifies divergence timelines. This service empowers in-depth academic explorations. It fosters novel theoretical developments in evolutionary biology. It inspires groundbreaking research hypotheses. These benefits are for scholars, evolutionary biologists, and bioinformatics researchers.
Evolutionary tree analysis is a specialized analytical approach that constructs and interprets evolutionary trees (phylogenies) to elucidate the evolutionary relationships among species, populations, or genes. By analyzing genetic sequences, morphological traits, or other molecular markers, this method reconstructs the branching patterns of evolutionary history, estimates divergence times, and infers the mechanisms driving lineage diversification. It enables researchers to trace the ancestral connections between organisms, identify key evolutionary transitions, and understand how ecological, genetic, and geographical factors have shaped biodiversity over time. Key advantages include the ability to resolve complex evolutionary scenarios, the integration of diverse data types (e.g., DNA, RNA, proteins), and the capacity to test hypotheses about evolutionary processes (e.g., speciation, adaptation, hybridization).
Our Evolutionary Tree Analysis Service empowers your research with:
This specialized bioinformatics solution clarifies evolutionary relationships among species, genes, or populations. Evolutionary Tree Analysis utilizes advanced computational methods and various molecular datasets. It reconstructs the phylogenetic tree that shows the historical branch pattern. Skilled analysts apply algorithms to estimate divergence times, identify key evolutionary transitions, and infer drivers of lineage diversification. Researchers use this service to address the uncertainties in classification. This method can trace the characteristics of ancestors and reveal how ecological, genetic or geographical factors shape biodiversity. Whether studying speciation in wild organisms, pathogen evolution, or genetic innovations in domesticated species, it provides actionable insights into evolutionary history. Harness phylogenetics to refine hypotheses, integrate multi-omics data, and deepen understanding of life's evolutionary story.
Sample Type Selection:Human(Blood, saliva, buccal swabs, formalin-fixed tissues);
Plants/Animals(Leaves, seeds, hair follicles, muscle/liver biopsies); Microorganisms Environmental metagenomic samples (soil, water), cultured isolates
Table 1: Comparative genotyping techniques
| Technology | Application Scenario | Key Advantages |
| SNP Arrays (e.g., Axiom) | Rapid population screens, cost-effective projects | High-throughput processing, low per-sample cost, established validation |
| RAD-seq | Non-model organisms, low-budget studies | Reduced genome representation, unbiased locus sampling, no reference genome required |
| WGS | Deep ancestry inference, rare variant detection | Comprehensive genomic coverage, no ascertainment bias, ideal for evolutionary studies |
| Pool-seq | Large population studies, pooled samples | Cost-effective allele frequency estimation, reduced individual genotyping needs |
Filter SNPs with: Missingness >20%; Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium p-value < 1×10⁻⁶ Minor allele frequency (MAF) <1%
Implement batch effect correction when applicable
Dimensionality Reduction
Tools: PLINK, smartpca, EIGENSOFT
Application: Visualize population structure and ancestry clusters
Output: Eigenvectors representing principal genetic components
Objective: Estimate individual ancestry proportions
Parameters: Test K=1-10 clusters (or broader range for complex populations)
Validation: Cross-validation to determine optimal K value
Admixture/Migration Inference
Purpose: Detect historical gene flow between populations
Interpretation: Negative f3 values indicate admixture
Tools: ThreePop (TreeMix package), ADMIXTOOLS
Objective: Model population splits and migration events
Parameters: Test 0-5 migration edges
Validation: Compare residual fit to determine optimal model
Selection Sweep Detection
Application: Identify regions under recent positive selection
Implementation: Use selscan software with proper phase-switching correction
Method: Identify loci with extreme differentiation between populations
Tools: BayeScan, LOSITAN
Threshold: Loci with FST > 0.15 (moderate differentiation) or >0.25 (strong differentiation)
Recommended Visualization Tools
Implementation: ggplot2 (R), matplotlib (Python)
Best Practices: Color-code by population/cluster, include percentage variance explained
Features: Proportional ancestry visualization per individual
Enhancements: Add population labels, error bars for K uncertainty
Tools: Leaflet (interactive), ggplot2 (static)
Integration: Overlay genetic clusters with sampling locations
Advanced: Include migration edges from TreeMix analysis
Report Components
Key findings and evolutionary relationships
Summary statistics (sample sizes, QC metrics)
Figure 1: Evolutionary Tree Analysis
Evolutionary Disease Mechanisms: Reconstruct evolutionary trees to trace the origins and spread of pathogens (e.g., SARS-CoV-2 variants) or disease-associated genes (e.g., lactase persistence in humans), aiding pandemic tracking and genetic risk prediction.
Pharmacogenomic Evolution: Analyze evolutionary relationships of drug-metabolizing enzymes across populations to identify variants influencing drug response.
Climate-Resilient Crops: Use phylogenetic analysis to identify ancestral traits (e.g., cold tolerance in wild wheat relatives) for breeding programs, accelerating adaptation to climate change.
Crop Domestication Insights: Reconstruct domestication histories to pinpoint genomic regions under selection during crop evolution, guiding efforts to reintroduce lost traits (e.g., nutrient density in ancient wheat).
Livestock Adaptation: Map evolutionary trajectories of livestock (e.g., heat tolerance in chickens) to breed animals resilient to environmental stressors, enhancing sustainable production.
Wildlife Conservation: Analyze evolutionary trees of endangered species to identify genetic diversity hotspots and adaptive signatures, informing captive breeding or reintroduction programs.
Macroevolutionary Patterns: Test hypotheses about deep-time evolutionary trends (e.g., body size evolution in dinosaurs) using divergence time estimation and lineage diversification analyses.
Convergent Evolution: Identify independent evolutionary solutions to similar challenges (e.g., echolocation in bats and dolphins) via phylogenetic comparisons, uncovering universal adaptations.

Figure 2: Detailed information of Liberibacter species whose genomes were investigated in this study, including their evolutionary relationship, transmitted vectors, hosts, and associated diseases. The evolutionary relationship was derived from phylogenetic trees of 16S rRNA (Tan, 2021)
Evolutionary analysis of human respiratory syncytial virus collected in Myanmar between 2015 and 2018
Journal:Infect Genet Evol
Published:2021
This study explored genetic variation in the second hypervariable region (HVR) of the G gene of human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) from 1701 nasal swab samples collected from outpatients with acute respiratory infections at two general hospitals in the cities Yangon and Pyinmana in Myanmar from 2015 to 2018.
HRSV genotypes were characterized using phylogenetic trees constructed using the maximum likelihood method. Time-scale phylogenetic tree analyses were performed using the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo method.
In total, 244 (14.3%) samples were HRSV-positive and were classified as HRSV-A (n = 84, 34.4%), HRSV-B (n = 158, 64.8%), and co-detection of HRSV-A/HRSV-B (n = 2, 0.8%). HRSV epidemics occurred seasonally between July (1.9%, 15/785) and August (10.5%, 108/1028), with peak infections in September (35.8%, 149/416) and October (58.2%, 89/153). HRSV infection rate was higher in children ≥1 year of age than in those <1 year of age (70.5% vs. 29.5%). The most common HRSV symptoms in children were cough (80%–90%) and rhinorrhea (70%–100%). The predominant genotypes were ON1for HRSV-A (78%) and BA9 for HRSV-B (64%). Time to the most recent common ancestor was 2014 (95% highest posterior density [HPD], 2012–2015) for HRSV-A ON1 and 2009 (95% HPD, 2004–2012) for HRSV-B BA9. The mean evolutionary rate (substitutions/site/year) for HRSV-B (2.12 × 10−2, 95% HPD, 8.53 × 10−3–3.63 × 10−2) was slightly higher than that for HRSV-A (1.39 × 10−2, 95% HPD, 6.03 × 10−3–2.12 × 10−2).
Figure 2: Time scale phylogenetic tree of the human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV)-A ON1 G gene hypervariable region generated using the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo method. HRSV-A strains from Myanmar are shown on the right. The years of divergence are indicated as 95% highest probability density (95% HPD) in the horizontal light blue boxes at each branch point. The scale bar represents the unit of time (years).
Yes! Our team provides post-analysis support to help you interpret evolutionary patterns, test hypotheses, and contextualize findings within your field of study.
Our service supports:
References