Bacterial pangenome analysis and eukaryotic pangenome projects share a name but not a playbook. Genome structure, variation types, and study goals differ profoundly. This guide compares objectives, sampling, sequencing, pipelines, and QC. It helps you choose the right strategy for plant, animal, or human pangenomes versus bacterial cohorts.
Bacterial genomes are compact and gene-dense. Horizontal gene transfer is common. Plasmids, phages, and genomic islands move genes between strains. This shapes presence–absence signals, accessory inflation, and core stability.
Eukaryotic genomes emphasise structural variation and repeats. Transposons, segmental duplications, and centromeres complicate assembly. Many crops are polyploid or highly heterozygous. Gene families expand and contract across lineages.
These architectural contrasts define pangenome goals.
Definitions shift as well. The "core" in bacteria is often a large, stable set. In eukaryotes, core may shrink when paralogy and copy-number diversity rise. Your interpretation must reflect these realities.
Key takeaway: genome architecture sets the evidence you must collect. Match your analysis to the biology, not the other way around.
Sampling errors propagate through the entire pangenome. Design the cohort before generating data.
Bacterial projects
Clonal complexes, recombination, and habitat drive gene flow. Sample across time, geography, and source to avoid niche bias. If epidemiology or source attribution matters, add repeated sampling from key locations.
Actionable guidance:
Subtype-balanced Heaps' Law estimates of pangenome openness for 12 microbial pathogens. (Hyun J.C. et al. (2022) BMC Genomics).
Eukaryotic projects
Diversity, heterozygosity, and ploidy dominate design. For crops and animals, represent major breeds, landraces, or subpopulations. Capture related phenotypes if trait discovery is a goal. For outcrossing species, plan for larger cohorts to stabilise rare SVs.
Actionable guidance:
Metadata is non-negotiable. Record sample origin, library prep, sequencing run, and assembly caller. Use the same controlled vocabulary across the study. Metadata resolves batch effects and supports downstream statistics.
Your platform choice decides what you can see. Do not plan assembly after sequencing; design both together.
Bacteria
Short reads remain powerful for many questions. They are economical, and references are compact. However, repeats, plasmids, and phages challenge short reads. Long reads or hybrid strategies improve contiguity and plasmid resolution. For outbreak or source-tracking work, consistent short-read pipelines can still suffice.
Recommended approach:
Eukaryotes
Long reads are essential for repeat-rich genomes. HiFi or ONT with accurate basecalling yields near-complete contigs. Phasing uncovers haplotypes, SVs, and complex alleles. Telomere-to-telomere (T2T) may be justified for high-value references.
Recommended approach:
Overview of the Human Pangenome Reference: phased diploid assemblies integrated into a graph-based reference that captures novel alleles and complex structural variation across diverse haplotypes. (Liao W.-W. et al. (2023) Nature).
Assembly principles
Annotation drift hides biology. Harmonise before clustering.
Standardise the annotation caller, version, and protein database. Use the same product naming rules across samples. In bacteria, caller choice can split genes inconsistently. In eukaryotes, gene models and UTR decisions affect family boundaries.
Orthology and paralogy are harder in eukaryotes. Expanded families challenge one-to-one matches. Consider species-aware or tree-aware strategies where feasible. In bacteria, mobile elements and recombination upset naive identity thresholds.
Practical steps:
The bacterial and eukaryotic stacks diverge for good reasons. Choose tools that reflect your study design and your deliverables.
Bacterial stacks
When to prefer what:
Eukaryotic stacks
Start with long-read assembly and phasing. Graph references then capture haplotype diversity and SVs. Combine gene-level PAV with SV catalogs. The final pangenome often includes a graph-aware browser plus matrices for downstream analyses.
Typical components:
Interoperability matters. Decide early how family IDs, SV IDs, and graph nodes map to each other. Avoid ad-hoc renaming that breaks handoffs.
QC is not a final step. Build it into every stage.
Universal checks
Bacterial pitfalls
Mitigations:
Eukaryotic pitfalls
Mitigations:
Soft-core definitions
Be explicit about thresholds for "soft core" in both domains. Changing the cutoff from 95% to 99% can rewrite the narrative. Publish the rule in your methods and parameter files.
A pangenome is a hub, not an endpoint. Design exports to match downstream teams.
Bacterial use cases
Deliverables: a stable PAV matrix, partition labels, and parameter files. Include an interactive browser if groups must review families together.
Unrooted core genome phylogenetic tree of the Xanthomonas strains analyzed in this study. (Jha V. et al. (2023) Frontiers in Microbiology).
Eukaryotic use cases
Deliverables: phased assemblies, an SV catalog, graph-aware references, and harmonised PAV. Provide crosswalk tables so analysts can link gene families to SVs and graph nodes.
Overview of the process of going from WGS data for multiple species with their respective reference genomes to a super-pangenome in which all data is integrated across accessions and species. (van Workum D.-J.M. et al. (2024) BMC Plant Biology).
Handoffs and documentation
Use this one-page list before you kick off:
Study design
Data generation
Pipeline
QC & reporting
CD Genomics provides Pan Genome Sequencing and analysis for research institutes, universities, and R&D teams. We design sampling plans, generate high-quality long-read anchors, and deliver reproducible pangenomes with stable IDs, PAV matrices, partitions, and graph-aware exports. Services are non-clinical and not for individuals. If you need a scoped, end-to-end plan for bacterial or eukaryotic pangenomes, we can help align methods, timelines, and deliverables with your scientific goals.
Related reading:
References